What the heck is going on here???
I just read from Microsoft Watch that Microsoft has released a “follow-on” to the RC1 for Vista.  Back in the old days, release candidates were supposed to be just about ready for complete release.  Now Microsoft isn’t just doing multiple candidates, they’re shipping “bug fixes” for their release candidates!  Boy, these guys are in serious trouble…
10/2/2006 11:48:28 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  technology

Software Religion

Today, Joel Spolsky pointed to an essay by Steve Yegge talking about Good vs. Bad Agile.  Apparently, Steve had previously poo-poo’ed Agile development.  This was his opportunity to say that he was only 90% right (sigh).  The only thing his essay convinced me of was that he didn’t know what he was talking about.  Apparently, his idea of “Good Agile” is to schedule meetings in the middle of the day and let people work on whatever they want to.

I’m getting really tired of the software “religious wars”. You know what I mean:  where people get up on their soapbox and shoot off their metaphoric mouths about stuff that they don’t understand.  In fact, their main criticism seems to be that whatever they’re against is wrong because they don’t understand it.

By the way, if I didn’t make myself clear, Steve’s essay falls into this category. 

9/29/2006 12:27:12 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  development

Runway Serendipity

This past weekend, I found myself sitting at a table of my cousins (it was my sister’s and brother-in-law’s 25th wedding anniversary).  It turns out that we’re all Runway fans.  What are the odds?

9/27/2006 8:56:55 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  TV | general

Representing Reality

John Dvorak has an article on “Photography and the Truth” today.  This got me thinking.  Before there was photography, no one considered pictures as accurate representations of reality.  Even a painting of a person was accepted as an artist’s interpretation of that person.

Thanks to living in a world of photographs, we presume that pictures somehow represent “reality” now.  Here’s the clincher: we also assume that pictures done before photography also represent reality.  This leads people to think that our ancestors must have been incredibly delusional to think some of what they painted was real.  Frankly, I think those ancestors would be amazed at how easily we accept photographs as “real” today, and using a program like Photoshop to “change” a picture would probably seem perfectly reasonable to them.

9/19/2006 4:06:43 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [1]  general

Premiere Week starts

While the days of a single “premiere week” for network television are long gone, this week comes closest.  After the drought of the summer, we have new shows starting this week right and left, mostly on CBS.  Here’s last night’s recap, based upon what I watched:

CBS Comedies:  CBS has pretty much taken over the first two hours of Monday night with comedies.  This year, we have three returnees and one newbee.

The Class:  This is the only new show on CBS’s Monday schedule.  A bunch of third-grade classmates get re-acquainted.  The show’s been described as a “Friends-style” show, and it has a lot in common with that one, including a really bad start (for those that don’t remember, Friends was pretty solidly panned when it started as a “Sienfeld rip-off”).  The show has some potential.  We’ll see where it goes.

How I Met Your Mother:  It’s pretty obvious by now, that the “mother” isn’t going to be making an entrance into this show anytime soon.  The title of the show should be more like “What my friends and I did before your mother met me and straightened me out”.  It remains an okay show, but nowhere near as funny as the critics would like you to think.

Two and a Half Men:  Here we go, series re-start. Last season ended with Alan (the nebbish brother) getting married to his girlfriend, Kandi.  So, of course, this season Charlie has gone back to his partying ways (the likes of which we never saw before), and (like clockwork) Alan gets dumped by Kandi. Yawn.  As an aside, I’m going to miss Kandi. I thought she was a great character.  However, I’m hoping this season we’ll see more of Rose, the next door neighbor stalker with the psych degree (another great character).  Also, more of Jake, Alan’s son.  You know, the show is definitely best when Charlie and Alan play straight man to the rest of the cast.  Here’s hoping.

The New Adventures of Old Christine:  I continue to have mixed feelings about this show (Julia Louis-Dreyfus' Emmy notwithstanding).  Her character is amazingly funny and way more non-PC than is usually allowed on network television, but the plots of the show are incredibly tedious and boring.  I hear that Wanda Sykes will have a bigger part this season.  That should liven things up a bit.

No shining start in the CBS comedy lineup.  But, on to the big fish on the new Monday lineup:  Studio 60!

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip:  This show’s gotten a lot of hype, thanks to the identities of the producers:  Aaron Sorkin and Tommy Schlamme.  They’re the creative force behind Sports Night (for those that remember) and West Wing. Likewise, I’ve been looking forward to this show, since I’m a big Aaron Sorkin fan.  The show turned out to be a bit of a surprise, mostly pleasant.  It’s a lot darker than Aaron’s previous two shows.  There’s a definite “sinister” quality to the show; most of the sets are downright dark.  The scenes of the show seemed to say “dramedy”, a la Ally McBeal or Boston Legal.  The reality (at least from the pilot) is that this show is much more serious than even West Wing was.  Yes, there are funny parts (Matthew Perry plays a comedy writer after all), but it comes across as more “comedy relief” than part of the main plot.  I thought that it was also interesting that, while the show has an ensemble cast, it seems to center around Matthew’s and Bradley Whitford’s characters.  I expected this. What I didn’t expect was that Matthew’s character would be the “lead” between the two.  In West Wing, there was originally a similar arrangement with Bradley Whitford (Josh Lyman) and Rob Lowe (Sam Seaborn), but it was Bradley that ended up being the main guy there, with Rob playing “straight man”.  Somehow, I expected the same in Studio 60.  Instead, its Matthew who takes the lead.  And, by the way, this is terrific.  I think Matthew Perry will be showing us just how good a dramatic actor he can be. He was probably the best in the pilot, followed closely by Sarah Paulson.  Also, its great to see Amanda Peet back on television.  I was a big Jack and Jill fan, and have loved her various screen parts.  Steven Weber is also terrific as the slimy executive responsible for much of the trouble on the show that Matthew and Bradley have stepped in to save.  All in all, if Aaron and company can keep the quality as high as the pilot, this will be the Emmy winner for best drama next year.

9/19/2006 10:04:48 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  TV

Thoughts on scripting languages vs. compiled languages

Back in my salad days, I used to write programs for the Wang minicomputer.  The majority of what I wrote was in COBOL (yes, I know).  However, the Wang had a built-in scripting language called “Procedure” that served the same purpose as JCL did on the mainframe IBM’s.  Procedure was powerful enough that you could use it as a batch language, and build applications by gluing together utility programs, similar to what we do with BAT files on the PC.

While Procedure was very simple to use, and made getting certain applications up and running quickly, it had a big drawback: it was dog slow.  So, if it looked like my quick and dirty utility written Procedure was going to be used for a while, I rewrote it in COBOL.  The second writing took a lot longer than the first, but since I’d already proved that the application had significant usefulness, it made sense to rewrite it.

It seems to me that this is a good rule of thumb for modern scripting languages vs. their compiled siblings: Use the scripting languages to try stuff out and come up with something that’s useful. If it looks like the app will be used often, take the time to rewrite it in Java or C# (please, oh please don’t even try to write it in C++).  As I discovered 20 years ago, this approach gets the value you need when you need it.

9/18/2006 8:58:53 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  development

The fog starts to clear: Amazon Unboxed and the "Fast Forward" problem.

I was using my Media Center (where I ran into the Unboxed issue I talked about earlier) and discovered a couple of things:  Amazon does, indeed, use Microsoft technology for their videos:  The Mythbusters video I bought automatically appeared in my Media Center Videos list; the file is actually a WMV file.  The Fast Forward / Seek problem that I had with it also happens with Media Center.

After a quick Google search, it turns out that FF/Seek only works on indexed files. So:
1. This is not an “Amazon Player” problem per se, since all WMV’s exhibit the same behavior
2. The video player in Media Center is different than Windows Media Player: When I ran a video with WMP outside of the Media Center software, it acted like it had never been run before.
3. The Media Center video player can’t FF/Seek indexed videos (that seek fine in Real Player or Divx Player).

My conclusions:
1. Amazon is sitll not off the hook, because:  There were a lot of problems other than the lack of seek support; if they’d just indexed the file, Seek would have been supported with other players.
2. The Media Center video player also needs work.  FF/Seek works fine for recorded TV shows; it should work for pre-recorded shows as well (at least those with the necessary indexing).

Amazon, Microsoft, get with the program! I just might have to try out the new ReplayTV software after all…

9/17/2006 10:17:39 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  general | technology

Some people are clueless
Yahoo news posted an article about the Survivor Cook Islands premiere, where they said that it was a “a bust”.  Apparently, the show could only be successful if it indeed turned out to be objectionable.  Perhaps this says something about Yahoo’s editorial staff…
9/15/2006 1:57:49 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  TV

One Reality season ends, and another begins

Reality alert:  Those of you who hate these shows, this one’s not for you.

 

This week, we saw the end of Big Brother All-Stars and the start of Survivor Cook Islands.

Big Brother: 
I didn’t watch much of Big Brother this year. The show’s getting long in the tooth, and pretty boring.  That being said, the final episodes were great.  Seeing Will Kirby, the “evil doctor” from BB 2, make it to the final four was amazing.  Some history for those of you who haven’t followed the show since its start:  Will was the winner of BB 2 (the only winner to make the All-Stars show), whose strategy was to tell everyone that he’d betray them, but always be nice to them (until the actual betrayal, which always happened).  He was a legend.  Among other things, that meant that he walked into BB 2 with the biggest target on his back. He plays the same kind of game, this time supported by his partner Mike “Boogie” Malin (They were allied in BB 2, but Will didn’t start his game winning strategy until after Mike was voted out).  At one point, Will announces to the whole household that he hates all of them! So, of course, they don’t vote him out. This turned out the be the most entertaining feature of the show, how “Chill Town” (Will and Boogie called themselves) went from underdogs to dominating the game.  Ultimately, Mike walked away with the victory, in no small part due to the great success of Chill Town’s strategy.

That being said, I really hope this is the last season for BB (probably not  ), because next year it’ll be back to the same old stale contestants.

Survivor Cook Islands:
This show’s been getting a lot of bad press the past few weeks, thanks to their “segregation” twist:  This year, there are 4 “tribes”, divided by “race”.  Of course, these are the American versions of race:  “African American”, “Asian American”, “Hispanic”, and “Caucasian”.  Being an “ethnic” person myself, I’m generally entertained when “white” folks find themselves being confronted by the fact that people are different, and have different backgrounds.  Here’s the “dirty little secret” that no one wanted to talk about before this show:  the “Caucasians” are a minority!  The last time I did my math, 5 out of 20 (or even 1 out of 4) does not constitute a majority.  In fact, this is the first season of Survivor where the white contestants are outnumbered!  Interestingly, the “Caucasian” tribe came in 3rd out of the 4 tribes in the first competition.  Stunt or no stunt, this new Survivor twist has restarted my interest in the show.

9/15/2006 10:31:58 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  TV

Books, Books, Books.

Today, I saw a post from Jennifer that led to her list of favorite (and not so favorite) books.  This sort of boggled my mind, since I wanted to post about two books that I have: one I just finished reading, and one I’m reading now:

Practices of an Agile Developer (Venkat Subramaniam & Andy Hunt, ISBN 097451408X):
I just finished reading this; its probably the best book on agile development that I’ve ever read.  The book is very practical, and not geared to a particular flavor of agile development, like the XP books are.  I’d put this on my “must read” list for any developer.

Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices in C# (Robert C. Martin & Micah Martin, ISBN 0131857258):
This is an interesting book, because its a re-do of a book that “Uncle Bob” wrote a while back focused on Java.  This book makes his points (all language agnostic) more accessible to C# programmers.  There’s an excellent chapter on an example of agile development around scoring bowling.  I saw Bob do this live, and it was remarkable.

I’m thinking of putting up a list like Jennifer’s, but at this point, that seems a daunting task:  I read a lot of books!

9/13/2006 8:53:35 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)      Comments [0]  general | books